Video Best Food Storage Containers of 2022

Number of Containers: 2 | Material (Vessel/Lid): BPA free plastic

If you are moving through large quantities of dried goods like flour, sugar, or even dried beans or rice, having bulk containers is the way to go. The Chef’s Path’s two 5.2-liter canisters offer wide openings for scooping out the contents and include measuring cups for this purpose. Their square shape means that they fit well in a cupboard or on a shelf. The 4-snap, watertight lids also help to keep the contents fresh and dry. The transparent BPA-free plastic makes it easy to identify the stored items. If you have two similar-looking staples, however, you’ll want to make use of the marker and labels included with the set.

Although the size, shape, and seal on these containers leave little to gripe about, we are concerned about the long-term durability of the snaps securing the lids. Unlike some of the other containers in this review, the Chef’s Path does not use hinges on their snaps. This means that a thin plastic strip prone to fatigue provides the movement needed for the snap to work. Additionally, the container itself is a bit thinner than we’d like. On the other hand, this thinness keeps them lightweight. The containers are tapered to nest inside one another when being transported or not in use. All in all, these plastic canisters offer a great alternative to single-use bags both for food freshness and environmental conscientiousness.

Reading: Best nesting food storage containers

Number of Containers: 9 | Material (Vessel/Lid): Glass/BPA free plastic

There’s a lot to like about the Pyrex Simply Store set. What really distinguishes this storage system, however, is that Pyrex allows customers to replace lids or vessels individually on their website. Surprisingly, this is quite rare for a food storage company and speaks to the pride this American manufacturer takes in their products. This set is also one of the few that comes in a multitude of sizes and shapes. Given that these containers are legitimate cookware, we found the option of making various-sized casseroles and lasagnas fun and practical for on-the-go meals.

The reason the Simply Store set didn’t rate higher in our evaluation is that the lids are not watertight, and the vessels don’t nest together well for storage. That’s it. All in all, this is a well-made product that doesn’t stain or retain odors. As an additional consideration, the lack of moving parts in the lid design reduces potential points of failure.

Number of Containers: 7 | Material: Silicone

Although there were several reusable bags in our testing group that seal with a slider bar, the Leafy Home Silicone Ziplock Bags performed the best of the bunch. The wide bottom of these bags makes filling easy because they can stand on their own. This feature also makes them suitable for cooking applications such as sous vide, steaming, or reheating in hot water. The seal is watertight and, while the bags do hold stains, they are some of the more stain-resistant of the reusable bags we tested.

Despite being more stain-resistant than the other food storage bags in our review, the Leafy Home still displayed discoloration and lingering food smells following our red sauce test. Exacerbating this issue is the cupped shape of the bag bottom, which complicates cleaning. An additional concern is the closure mechanism. The plastic bar that slides across the silicone bag can be grabby and difficult to close, so we occasionally had to resort to wetting this bar for lubrication on the larger bags. That said, if you’re storing liquid foods or using the bag as a piece of cookware, they’re hard to beat.

Number of Containers: 5 | Material: BPA free plastic

Over the years, the author has spent a lot of time in the kitchen with his grandmother. In recent years, he’s noticed the increased difficulty that her hands have when opening jars or other sealed containers. When the OXO POP came across his desk, he immediately thought of how beneficial this system would be to her. These containers can open and completely seal with the push of a button. Having reviewed many products from OXO over the years, our team has come to expect high-quality manufacturing and elegant designs, and the POP series did not disappoint. The unique shapes (such as a spaghetti-sized container) and the crystal clear plastic will tempt you to leave them out on the counter as practical decorations.

For the price, we wish there were more than five containers in the set. Additionally, the plastic is prone to showing scratches. However, unlike the lower-end plastics used by some of the competition, these containers performed much like glass in the tomato sauce test, retaining no stains or odors after a quick cleaning in the sink. Finally, it’s worth noting that OXO is a member of 1% For the Planet, the gold standard for environmental philanthropy, and any purchase contributes directly to this organization’s programs.

Table of Contents

Why You Should Trust Us

Senior Review Editor Nick Miley is an obsessive home cook who enjoys spending a Sunday afternoon cooking from scratch and storing up delicious meals for the workweek. He cut his teeth in the culinary business as a 16-year old prep cook for a busy riverside fish shack on Alaska’s Kenai Peninsula. From then to now, Nick has tried out nearly every type of food container and knows a good product when he gets his hands on it. He has used this experience to research, buy, test, and rate kitchen products and share his findings with the general public.

To evaluate the quality and functionality of the food storage sets in this review, we focused on the materials, sealing mechanism, and stackability, as well as stain and odor retention. Additionally, we looked at the economy of the products and how many containers each set includes. We also investigated the possibility of replacing the lids and vessels and the social responsibility practiced by the manufacturers. The latter assessment includes product end-of-life plans and additional philanthropic activities.

Analysis and Test Results

Our evaluation of food storage sets began with discussions about common frustrations with these products. Not surprisingly, most people’s complaints fell into just a few categories. The first were issues with the lid — primarily ineffective seals or closure failures. Discoloration of the materials and linger smells was another concern. Finally, cupboard stackability and the inevitable lost lid that can’t be replaced were further complaints. Accordingly, we devised tests to investigate all of these issues. The following are the details of this evaluation, including which product performed the best and why.

Seal

For a food container to work effectively, it must be able to seal. This is particularly true if the container is to be used for transporting food outside of the house. Except for the Pyrex Simply Store, all of the products reviewed here displayed excellent sealing. However, just because only one of these containers leaked water when inverted, shaken, and squeezed does not mean that the methods for achieving an effective seal were equivalent.

We favored containers like the Rubbermaid Brilliance with proper hinges connecting their snap wings to the lid rather than those with a thin piece of plastic like the Chef’s Path. The latter design is common and seems destined to wear and fail with time. As for the bags, we preferred the zip or pinch lock models because the seal is easy to make, and the audible snap at the end confirms it has occurred. The slider bar models were less to our liking. The main reason for this is the sticky nature of the silicone bag. The wider the opening of the bag, the more of a problem we had with them.

As a final consideration, we found that we preferred the containers that incorporate removable gaskets. The C Crest as well as the Chef’s Path provide this feature, which makes cleaning that much easier.

Stains and Odor

If you’ve ever reheated spaghetti or lasagna in a plastic container, then you have a good idea of the orangish hue that a well-used food container can acquire over time. Given this disagreeable, though all too common outcome, we devised what we call the red sauce test.

The test was simple. We heated store-bought tomato sauce and poured it into the containers under review. We allowed the sauce to cool and then stuck the containers with the sauce in the refrigerator overnight. We then cleaned the containers in the sink. Because this test was conducted on just one of the units in each set, we were able to perform side-by-side, before-and-after comparison for coloration and smell.

It should come as no surprise that the glass models such as the C Crest and the Pyrex fared best, while plastic products like the Chef’s Path bags were left colored and odoriferous. What was surprising and impressive is that some plastic models like the Rubbermaid and the OXO rendered results akin to glass models. Now that’s some high-end plastic.

User Experience

This broad category of assessment covers product details such as stackability, the number and the volume of containers in each set, the construction material, and whether they are BPA-free. We also looked at where the products are made, whether the lids and vessels are easily replaceable, and if the company has a product “end of life” policy.

Rubbermaid, OXO, and Pyrex made good showings in this analysis. While these products don’t nest as well as others, their manufacturing is of high quality. Rubbermaid is entirely made in the USA, and they have partnered with TerraCycle to provide an end-of-life option for customers that have worn out their containers. Similarly, Pyrex manufactures all of their lids in the USA and many of their vessels as well. Replacement lids and vessels are available for purchase should you lose or break them. Finally, OXO is a member of the 1% for the Planet organization, which is arguably the premier environmental nonprofit.

All the containers in our review are BPA-free. As for stackability, the Joseph Joseph are head and shoulders above the rest as the entire set can fit into its largest container. The C Crest glass containers come in a set of 10, and the eoglo reusable bags come in a pack of 11. At 5.2-liters, the Chef’s Path bulk containers are among the biggest we’ve reviewed.

Conclusion

This review of food storage sets tried to cover everything you might want to know before purchase. Our investigation ranged from the quality and type of seal used to secure the lid to the container, stain, and odor resistance, as well as an assessment of the user’s experience. This last topic looks at the construction materials, the companies’ conscientiousness, including waste management, environmental policies, and the availability of replacement parts. Finally, we looked at space-saving products, set counts, and volume. In a fast-paced world, it’s nice to have good food ready to go without creating any unnecessary waste. We hope that this article will aid you in that effort.

Please see more list about Best nesting food storage containers

Source: https://www.techgearlab.com/topics/kitchen/best-food-storage-set